30 Days of Tennis Challenge – Day 10: Favorite retired women’s player
August 5, 2011 10 Comments
Old man says living is killing a lion every day. It depends, but I could see that happening, yes. But if we are talking about shooting down a daily trivia instead of the king of the jungle, this day was, in the end, a pussycat.
I’m not a long time WTA fan – thought it might have already surpassed ATP nowadays. The reasons are many. First, I’m not a long time ATP fan either. Second, it’s hard to get it on TV. Third, I only learned about the existence of live streams about a year ago or so. Fourth, since our best women’s tennis representative played in the sainted days of the 50s/60s, the exposure for the girls is almost non-existent in times without internet or even Twitter.
After justifying – and I’m not sure why – here it is my favorite retired women:

Why did you have to be here, Lena? (BTW, I was looking forward to put a picture of her playing tennis. But I just feel in love with this photo
It couldn’t be different, or could it? I have this theory Elena Dementieva and Marat Safin would have made the best Hopman Cup team of all time, by far.
Talking about further-ness, before Kim Clijsters showed up in my life, I had no doubt about my faves. They were Dinara Safina and Lena. I guess the reasons are all well-known to all of us. She is a dame, and a damsel. She’s gorgeous, had an outstanding posture, was never known for controversies (at least I’ve never heard of them). And she also played some effing good tennis – peaking at number 3 in 2009, winning sixteen career titles – Olympic gold included, but not Slams – though she hit the post twice in 2004.
Her retirement, at the Doha Year End Championships last year, got me by total surprise. I was all “Whaat, I left for ten minutes to cut my hair and Elena Dementieva retires from pro tennis?”. But all the tributes that were paid to her, all the videos (like this one) say for themselves. If she was loved even among her colleagues, who am I to dislike her?
Special mention
Before finishing, I will make an amend to include Martina Navratilova in this post. Never watched her playing, but do I need to? She won 167 singles titles, countless doubles’, and also completed the career Slam in mixed doubles. For God’s sakes, she won the US Open with one of the Bryans in 2006, and she was almost 50, no?
But I don’t like Martina for her titles – though they, yes, helped me, which is pretty ironic, since I usually dislike the dominant ones – or her lopsided head-to-heads (check out these ones v. Shriver, v. Garrison and v. Evert, which is not lopsided, but must be the GOAT).
What I do like in Navratilova is her personality. She just goes out and speaks it. And, as long as you’re not talking bananas – and as far as I’ve already read from her quotes, it’s not the case – there we have something I admire.
Useful:
Day 2 – Favorite women’s player
Day 4 – Least favorite men’s player
Day 5 – Least favorite women’s player
Day 7 – First player you became a fan of
I love Elena, but Martina Hingis was my first idol in this sport, so I pick her.
Special mention: Elena Dementieva, Amelie Mauresmo, Nicole Vaidisova and Ai Sugiyama lol
Ai Sugiyama! She won Wimbledon with Kim. Forever respect.
Pingback: 30 Days of Tennis Challenge – Dia 10: Jogadora aposentada favorita « T de Tênis
Pingback: 30 Days of Tennis Challenge – Day 10 – Daily Scores – The Blog | The Tennis News
Pingback: 30 Days of Tennis Challenge – Day 10 – Daily Scores – The Blog
Pingback: 30 Days of Tennis Challenge – Day 11: A player nobody would expect you to love « Daily Scores – The Blog
I love Elena, and miss her a lot..but i’ll differente this time.
don’t share this taste with a lot of persons, but I miss Lindsay Davenport on court.
she is a genius, seriously.
she serves well, is agressive, has a amazing vision of game…
I’m a huge Lindsay’s fan…loved saw her playing with Martina in the Aunts Open of Wimbledon (aka ladies invitation)
Pingback: 30 Days of Tennis Challenge – Day 21: Favorite women’s Slam champion « Daily Scores – The Blog
How is it that just anyone can publish a blog and get as popular as this? Its not like youve said anything incredibly impressive more like youve painted a quite picture through an issue that you know nothing about! I dont want to sound mean, right here. But do you genuinely think that you can get away with adding some quite pictures and not truly say something?
I liked your article is an interesting technology
thanks to google I found you